February 6, 2009

  • Question 120 – Question on the Vatican's Dealing with Bishop Williamson and the Matter of the

    Question 120 –  Question on the Vatican's Dealing with Bishop Williamson and the Matter of the Holocaust



    What is your opinion about the issue between Bishop Williamson and the Pope? Does the pope have the authority to excommunicate Williamson if he doesn’t accept the holocaust as it is believed to have happened? I’m really confused about this.


    R. Sungenis: Michael, actually, the pope is not insisting on Williamson recanting his “holocaust denial” as a requirement to being readmitted to the Church or as a basis for being excommunicated from it, but only as a requirement for having his canonical function as a bishop restored, or what the Vatican said is his being “reinstated to episcopal service.”  According to the Zenit report:

    “The statement went on to reiterate the Pope's firm rejection of Bishop Williamson's opinion on the Shoah, stating that the prelate would have to "distance himself in an absolutely unmistakable and public way from his position" in order to be reinstated to episcopal service.”  

    Canonically, the pope does have the authority to bind Williamson in this way, since according to Vatican I, the pope’s disciplinary power over his clerics is unlimited and no one can question him.

    But, of course, this just begs the question. The ethical validity of the pope’s insistence that Williamson recant his opinion becomes a practical matter.  Since Williamson is essentially being accused of anti-semitism for denying a purported fact of history about the semites, and since anti-semitism is a mortal sin in the Catholic Church, then a canonical trial is really the only recourse for determining if, indeed, Williamson is guilty, since anti-semitism could be the only justifiable grounds upon which the pope’s discipline of Williamson could be administered.

    In order to have the matter adjudicated, Williamson would need to be charged with “anti-semitism,” and prior to that, an inquiry would need to determine the legal definition of anti-semitism. Once that is established, the trial would need to bring in expert testimony from historians, both pro and con, to determine whether there were, indeed, six million Jews killed in gas chambers by the Nazis.

    If it comes about that it is an undeniable fact of history that the Nazis killed six million Jews by gassing them, and Williamson continues to deny it, then the Church would most likely determine Williamson guilty of anti-semitism and bar him from his canonical functions.

    Of course, if it comes about that Williamson’s claims are true, then he cannot be charged with anti-semitism, and his views on the Jews cannot be used against him in determining whether to restore his canonical duties.

    Handling it in a canonical court instead of the court of public opinion requires the Vatican to prove its moves against Williamson by an unbiased examination of the facts. If the Vatican doesn’t do so, then they are committing an injustice against Williamson. The Vatican is old enough and mature enough to realize that it should not condemn someone based on majority opinion. A canonical trial is really the only way this matter can be solved in order to satisfy all parties involved.


Comments (16)

  • Hi Robert,

    Thanks for all your great work.

    A lot of people are waking up to what is really go on in the world, and this issue has put Rome right in the spotlight. If the Pope does not call a Canonical trial, I think he will be seen as powerless, and worse, manipulated, weak. Rome's voice will be shown to be irrelevant.

    In fact, a number of nations are calling for an examination of the Holocaust. Academics - in so called democracies of free speech - are being thrown into jail for their research. Isn't it ironic that this "humane society" that mocks Rome on its treatment of Galileo, is so ruthless in persecution of historians investigating the Holocaust?!

    Actually, I'm suprised anti-semitism is a mortal sin. What does that mean exactly? Isn't unjust hatred already a mortal sin? Is there an anti-irish mortal sin? An anti-palestinian mortal sin? an anti-greek mortal sin?

    Furthermore, are not semites the descendants of Shem - both Arab and Seraphardic Jews? According to some scholars, only a minority of Jews are semites.

    What about all the other peoples that suffered in Germany? What about all the other holocaust's - including those a significant number of Jews were involved in perpertrating, such as in the Russian revolution? I need not digress into the Financiers of these revolutions, I'm sure you get my point.

    Henry Makow, although I don't agree with his conclusions, does have an interesting point that this whole affair is meaningless unless its been orchestrated as an attack to weaken Catholicism. To me, the Canonical trial is the answer - 'The Truth will set you free'.

    I do understand the Pope is under intense pressure, has very real constraints, and I am shocked at the fickel-mindness of so many bishops in pressuring him. They can't be that stupid, or cowardly, surely?! Is this the fruit of the Alta-Vendita and other plans? I can't think of another explanation...

    Again, if the Pope bows to the New World Order on this, Rome will be seen as impotent, and irrelevant in this battle to save our civilization. She should be at the forefront, and drawing men of goodwill to Her. The Light shines brighter as the night darkens.

    Open the Canonical trial, this assault on Catholicism must be stopped.

    As for the rest of us, the Holy Father needs our prayers. Our Lady of Fatima told us to pray the Rosary, that is how we can help the Holy Father.

    Kind Regards


  • Let us not forget that perhaps the most incredibly bizarre and evil aspect of this terrible and seemingly out of control gigantic fiasco is that the pope via the Vatican's Secretariat of State directive (see "Nota della Segretaeria di Stato" on the front cover of the 5 February, 2009 issue of L'OSSERVATORE ROMANO as seen at http://newcatholic.googlepages.com/OR_20090205_001.pdf)has in effect required Bishop Williamson to lie (TO LIE -- AS IN TO BEAR FALSE WITNESS -- AS IN TO VIOLATE THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT OF ALMIGHTY GOD!) in order to be admitted "to episcopal functions in the Church."  (Perhaps, we can set our eyes on Calvary as we meditate upon the anguished words of our Saviour and then go on to hope and even pray to our heavenly Father that in this instance the reputed Vicar of Christ knows not what he does.) 
    Yes, in effect, Bishop Williamson is being instructed to violate his Catholic conscience by lying/prevaricating -- by basically saying he does not believe what he does believe and not only that, but to do it "in an absolutely unequivocal and public manner."  To do this would according to Catholic theology/beliefs/doctrine constitute a lie in the objective order (i.e., the act itself), assuming there was an accompanying intent to deceive.  (God judges the degree of personal/subjective culpability, if any, assigned to an individual for deliberately stating an untruth.  One obvious reason for a diminution of culpability is if the person stating the lie stated it while subject to psychological, physical, or spiritual duress.)
    The lie required of Bishop Williamson is to be made public before the whole world.  This lie would be an immensely huge deception in so much as it would be an implicit, if not explicit,  admission of truth by consent to the monstrous 6 Million Holocaust Myth/Lie/Sacred Talmudic Cow/Idol (which, in and of itself, constitutes a wicked calumny against the German people) by a strict presumably God fearing traditional Roman Catholic Bishop.  It is a tremendously evil (albeit "official") falsification of secular history which Pope Benedict XVI appears to accept as a given incontestable fact -- as though written infallibly in stone.

    The ever continuing and ever increasing massive and downright criminal 6 Million Holohoax/Shoah indoctrination of millions, if not billions, of people worldwide along with the often concurrent and never ending coercive monetary reparations for "Holocaust Survivors" (Ain't no business like Shoah business!) by the Judaic powers to be and their ever willing and or cowed gentile lackeys is truly mind boggling.  (Even if Bishop Williamson's Holocaust views were completely erroneous -- which they most definitely are not -- if he sincerely believes them in good faith, it would still constitute a violation of conscience to renounce them -- something strictly forbidden by Catholic doctrine.  The Catechism of the Catholic Church, for instance, clearly states in Paragraph 1790: "A human being must always obey the certain judgment of his conscience. If he were deliberately to act against it, he would condemn himself." (http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s1c1a6.htm#IV)  It goes without saying that for a properly informed rationale Catholic to deliberately lie is to at one and the same time violate his conscience. 
    Furthermore, the same catechism in Paragraph 1789 states one of the most basic of all Christian truths: "One may never do evil so that good may result from it;" The same paragraph goes on to state that "charity always proceeds by way of respect for one's neighbor and his conscience: 'Thus sinning against your brethren and wounding their conscience . . . you sin against Christ.' [1 Cor 8:12] Therefore 'it is right not to . . . do anything that makes your brother stumble [Rom 14:21].'" (http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s1c1a6.htm#IV)
    Let us reflect for a moment on the preceding words/admonishment from this official universal Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) in the context of the draconian demand placed upon Bishop Williamson.  Is not Bishop Williamson being given a requirement to do evil (violate his conscience by lying) so that a supposed good may result from it?  Then again, if, as the above paragraph from the CCC states, "charity always proceeds by way of respect for one's neighbor and his conscience" how in the world is the mandate from the Vatican to Bishop Williamson charitable?!  No, the directive is actually uncharitable to the nth degree in so far as it does anything but respect Bishop Williamson's conscience; and as such it causes an incredible scandal, in and of itself, to any properly informed Catholic, not to mention a vast multitude of largely uninformed Catholics and non-Catholics in general.
    The full translation of the above referenced directive/mandate (euphemistically referred to as a "Note") from the Secretariat of State (as of the time I am submitting this comment) can be seen at http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/.  For the convenience of anyone reading this I quote the most pertinent part of the text for my comments here: "Bishop Williamson, for an admission to episcopal functions in the Church, will also have to distance himself, in an absolutely unequivocal and public manner, from his positions regarding the Shoah, unknown to the Holy Father in the moment of the remission of the excommunication."

    One might argue that Bishop Williamson could save himself from lying by renouncing/recanting his previously expressed views regarding the alleged Holocaust, but by doing it by what is referred to in Catholic moral theology as mental reservation.  I am not a trained moral theologian, but from what I know of Catholic moral theology mental reservation would not be an applicable concept in any recanting -- God forbid! -- by Bishop Williamson.
    Let us inform ourselves to what should be an obvious fact.  The replacement of true unadulterated Christianity by what may be rightly called Christian Zionism and Holocaustianity is taking place around the world every day before our very eyes.  We are supposed to be Soldiers of Christ, not "hunker in the chapel bunker" cowards who bow down before human respect.  If we were taken before His Holy Tribunal would there even be enough evidence to convict us of being real Christians -- of belonging to the City of God as opposed to the City of man?
    Holocaustianity is not some cute play on words.  It is a damnable fact of everyday life which is sucking the life blood out of whatever remains of the Christian temporal order.  It must end and we must fight to bring about its end.  Whether we succeed or fail is not the point.  The point is that we must fight.  That is what real soldiers do!
    Let us fervently pray for His Excellency Bishop Williamson that he stand firm so as to set for us an example of non-compromising Catholic integrity and truth.  By his witness in courage let us be inspired and by the grace of Almighty God passed to us through the Immaculate Heart of Mary let us always and everywhere know, love, and serve the Truth!
    In Christ our King and Mary our Queen,
    James B. Phillips
    P.S. Anyone wishing to be really informed on the true nature of Judaism would do very well to check on the stunning new book "Judaism Discovered -- From Its Own Texts" by noted revisionist history scholar Michael A. Hoffman II.  This profoundly revealing book is actually banned from sales by the Judaic run Amazon.com, the world's largest bookstore.  Let the reader be his own judge as to why after he takes a look at the book at Mr. Hoffman's site http://www.revisionisthistory.org.

  • Bp Williamson wasn't asked to "recant" what he said about the Holocaust, but to "distance himself" from it. To do the latter he does not have to say that he has now changed his mind about the Holocaust; he merely has to say that it is inappropriate for a Catholic Bishop to make public statements about this historical event. The Vatican left him an opening to be "Jesuitical" with the press, but Bp Williamson does not seem to have taken advantage of that opportunity. Instead of making the neutral statement he said that he now intends to study up on the matter once again. You'd think that, as a scholar of the Holocaust, he'd have been keeping up with the literature that has come out since the 1980's.

  • No, Rome and the spin coming out of official and officially-related Catholic news agencies is quite unmistakable.

    Rome has tripped over itself to satisfy the demands of the New World Order, it's nauseauting, and extremly disappointing.

    For a long time, as a Catholic is obliged to, I have defended Rome passionately, despite some very confusing actions, including the Vatican's unfair prosecution of traditional Catholics, and the protection of outright heretics, my reasoning was thus:

    Major Premise: Pope is good

    Minor Premise: He is surrounded by enemies (outside and inside - ie. ambitous or decieved or the results of plans like the Alta Vendita, Masonry, Communism, etc.)

    Conclusion: The Pope is doing the best he can in the given circumstances.

    After reading "One hundred years of modernism", and other material, I was shocked to learn that the then Cardinal Ratzinger, carrying the torch from Rahner, promoted his neo-modernist protegees to positions of power, effectively elevating a small underground network into a controlling group. Given we are teleogical creatures, what is the agenda?

    I'm absolutely bewildered at the moment.

    It is indisputable that the Shoah is being used as a very powerful political weapon, and never has its power being so evident as in these recent developments.

    Why not call a Canonical Trial? Bring the evidence to the surface? Settle this issue once and for all.

    The Holy Father needs to look more to Pope Leo XIII and less to Martin Luther.

    With the Remnant and others signing petitions to support the Holy Father, and I agree he needs our prayers, but how about we spare a thought for Bishop Williamson and his soul?

    Finally, another book worth reading is E. Michael Jones's The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit.

  • Hi, Robert I am gene53, I would like  to make a comment regarding the fury unleashed by the Jew's Media regarding the statement of bishop Willian Richardson about the figure of the holocaust, which he denied were six million Jews sacrificed, duiring the Nazi terror. Just for the record, please read the books of Viconte Poncins de Leon about the holocaust. This Frech author was accused of traison by the Jews duiring the WWII but, he defended hinself, using the information given by the Jews scholars about the holocaust. Until now, no one, but no one has ever tryied to defend the bishop against the Sinagogue of Satan. The holocaust, is used to tied the heroic persons against the world agenda of the Zionist movement, and tha sad thing is that of the mostly of the bishops defended the Jew holocaust on top of the Divine Holocaust. Only a blind person cannot see this legate of the Spirit of VCII. I am not a denier of the holocaust, for obvious reasons.

    Your brother in Christ the King gene53.

  • I agree with Dr. Sungenis but with the caveat that trials can be fixed.  Since the Pope has emphasized he accepts the historicity of the Holocaust (plus his ecumaniacal obseqiousness toward the Jews coupled with the ire of Modernist echelons in the Curia), I don't see how Bishop Williamson could get a fair trial.  We certainly learned who rules in Buenos Aires in the matter of Bishop Williamson, and I believe they have very strong influence in Rome, also.  Has anyone ever asked why it is a crime to question an historical event?  Do we put Jews in jail because they publicly deny our Lord Jesus Christ as the Messiah?  It seems to me that the fact of so-called "thought crimes" or "hate crimes" reflect the existence of a tyranny against truth and demand political correctness, which I believe the Modernists in the Catholic Church, including the Pope, subscribe to.  For all here, I merely raise the recent event in Los Angeles, among others elsewhere,  involving Cardinal Mahoney's condemnation of Bishop Williamson.  May the Holy God resolve the issue for His Greater Honor and Glory.

  • "In order to be admitted to function as a Bishop within the Church, Bishop Williamson must also distance himself in an absolutely unequivocal and public way from his positions regarding the Shoah which were unknown to the Holy Father at the time of the remission of the excommunication." (Vatican Secretary of State)

    Robert, at what point does the Vatican's statements or actions on this matter constitute a heresy or grave moral disorder? Especially considered In the light of all that has been said and done by Rome in reaction to this Zionist outrage, and Rome's subsequent rejections of the Bishop's Apology.

    If words still signify things, then it seems to me apparant that they are making belief in the Shoah a requirement for H.E. to be admitted as a Bishop within the Church. And by extension, and indirectly, to all the faithful.

    How long are we expected to tolerate ambiguity? What happened to Our Lord's admonish "Let your Yes be Yes and your No be No? Common sense has always told us:

    If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, it must be a duck

    I would appreciate any advice you may have, I am thoroughly confused by this, and a series of other troubling statements and actions emerging from the Vatican over the last 10 years.

  • To quote above:"

    "If it comes about that it is an undeniable fact of history that the Nazis killed six million Jews by gassing them, and Williamson continues to deny it, then the Church would most likely determine Williamson guilty of anti-semitism and bar him from his canonical functions.

    Of course, if it comes about that Williamson’s claims are true, then he cannot be charged with anti-semitism, and his views on the Jews cannot be used against him in determining whether to restore his canonical duties."

    Considering the fact that Germany admits it happened and recently opened archives of records showing names,date of death and method of murder, it really takes a complete moron or a complete racist scum to deny it happened.Fact of the matter is,Germany opened the records showing the death information of 100's of thousands the day Iran had thier moronic moritorium on how the Shoah didn't happen and this was only one record vault.

  • Hezekiah4, why do you and your ilk constantly resort to insults?

    No one is questioning thousands and thousands.It's the six MILLION part which is the problem. Official figures do not even tally to six million.

    How is it the Zionists can deny facts of Christ's life, but if people question "The Shoah" they are evil?

    Before 1970, the Holocaust related to the whole of the twentieth century, or to events like the bombing of refugess in Dresden.

    How many people were killed by Jewish run slaughters, like the Russian Revolution? Do those Holocaust's count? Not according to the Talmudic scholars, because only Jews are men.

    Catholics create a movie like the Passion of the Christ, in a Western (spell Catholic) culture, and we're evil Antisemites. Israel blows the 'Amalecks' (Palestinians) to hell, and if we criticize that, we're evil Antisemites.

    Heads you win, tails we lose.

    Where is truth in all of this? Why are scholars going to jail?

    Your remarks don't bother me, they are typical. What disturbs me is that Rome used to stand up for truth against this evil.

  • His Excellency not only questioned the Kaballistic "6 million," but also the matter of "gas chambers." A director at Auschwitz was interviewed on videotape and admitted that the "gas chamber" was fabricated AFTER the war by the Communists, has a wooden door, and no cyanide residue. Many other relevant videos are here, but the director’s admissions are in the series of interview by David Cole (who himself is a Jew):

    The "6 million" number is a number that has magical gematria
    significance to occultic Judaism's Kabbalists.

    The Torah has a long tradition of lying victimhood. Forexample, note the typically ridiculous self-reports of victimhood in tractate Gittin of the Torah, the 4 billion (yes, BILLION) Jews killed by the Romans [Gittin 57b claims Vespasian killed “four hundred thousand myriads” = 400,000 x 10,000 = 4 BILLION] and the 64 million Jewish children skewered and burned in scrolls by the Romans in one city alone [Gittin 58a claims “400 synagogues” each with “400 teachers” and “400 pupils” for each teacher” = 400 x 400 x 400 = 64 million].

    Then there is the lying “eyewitness” testimony. 
    Watch ABC News video of "Holocaust eyewitness,” Herman Rosenblat upholding his self-deception and deception of millions of others:

    How can you say it wasn't a lie? It wasn't true and you know it's not true.

    Yes, it's not true, but in my imagination it was true.


    But the Torah excuses such lying because it is OK to lie to Gentiles [Baba Kamma 113a] and it is OK to lie when everyone should know you are lying, called "guzmah" [Hullin 90b].

    Even the Holocaust Fundamentalist "scholars" have RECANTED THEIR CLAIMS:

The Victories of Revisionism
    http://www.tellingfilms.co.uk/Victoires%20révisionnisme%20ENG.pdf Professor
    O'Connell also published a well-documented study of the Holocaust
    "saint" Elie Wiesel's lies. For his effort, the Holocaust Fundamentalists
    attempted to have him fired.


  • @DiegoMilagro - I se you get your Talmud quotes from Pranaitis' book of garbage. Gittim isn't the Torah,it's the Talmud BTW.

    Speaking of Pranaitis, who racists love to quote and claim he was a Talmud expert:

    The Reverend I.B. Pranaitis was a turn-of-the-century Russian anti-Semite who was "Master of Theology and Professor of the Hebrew Language at the Imperial Ecclesiastical Academy of the Roman Catholic Church" in Old St.Petersburg, Russia. He also had a criminal record. In 1892, with the support of his Archbishop, he published an anti-Semitic tract in Latin called "Christianus in Talmude Iudaeorum" or as it became known in English, "The Talmud Unmasked, The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians" which was translated into English by American anti-Semites around 1939.

    Pranaitis is revered by anti-Semites as a "Talmud Scholar". For example at a hate-site on the Web, http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/factindx.htm#Facts are Facts we find "The Rev. Pranaitis was the greatest of the students of the Talmud. His complete command of the Hebrew language qualified him to analyze the Talmud as few men in history". (Interestingly, a vast majority of the Talmud is not even written in Hebrew, but this minor problem will be ignored for the moment.) The reality concerning this "scholar" is very different as was even proven in an anti-Semitic court.

    This occurred in the infamous "blood libel" case of Mendel Beiliss in Russia in 1912 where Beiliss was accused of murdering a Christian child to take his blood for alleged Jewish rituals and to put in Passover Matzah (unleavened bread). (Incidentally, the first known "blood libel" case occurred in Norwich, England in 1144.)

    Pranaitis was called as a prosecution witness to testify to the allegedly horrible things said about Christians in the Talmud. His credibility, however, was quickly destroyed by the defence who asked him a few basic questions which anyone with even the slightest knowledge of the Talmud would be expected to know:

    The particular questions that Panaitis was asked under cross-examination that completely destroyed his credibility were as follows:

    Q: What is the meaning of the word Hullin?
    A: I don't know.
    ("Hullin" means "ordinary produce" in Hebrew as opposed to "sanctified produce".)

    Q: What is the meaning of the word Erubin?
    A: I don't know.
    ("Erubin" means "domains which have been set up to allow Jews to carry outside their homes on the Sabbath".)

    Q: What is the meaning of the word Yevamot?
    A: I don't know.
    ("Yevamot" means "brothers in law in reference to Leverite marriage - a certain type of marriage relating to the command to marry one's dead brother's wife if he died without children".)

    Q: When did Baba Bathra live and what was her activity?
    A: I don't know.
    (Baba Bathra was not a person but it is a Talmudic Tractate.)

    Ref: "Blood Accusation: The Strange History of the Beiliss Case" by Maurice Samuel. Quote supplied by Joseph Hertzlinger (jhertzli@ix.netcom.com)

    Other books concerning this "trial" are:

    "The Russian Jew under the Tsars and Soviets" by Salo W. Baron

    "History of the Jews in Russia and Poland", S. M. Dubnow

    "The Decay of Czarism: The Beilis Trial" by Alexander B. Tager.

    "The Beilis Transcripts: The Anti-Semitic Trial that Shook the World", E. Leikin, Aronson, New Jersey, 1993, ISBN 0-87668-179-8

    So much for Pranaitis' credibility. Nevertheless, his quotes keep getting circulated and most recently were even taught in the class room of school teacher Mr James Keegstra in Eckville, Alberta, Canada. He was dissmised from his post in 1982. (See http://www1.ca.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/k/keegstra.jim/supreme.court/facts)

    The majority of the Talmud "quotes" in this document are derived from Pranaitis' book.

    Pranaitis in the Beiliss "Blood Libel" trial.

    This is an extract of "Scapegoat on Trial: The Story of Mendel Beiliss – The Autobiography of Mendel Beiliss" Shari Schwarz, editor. [Note the variant spelling of Pranaitis.]

    The star witness for the prosecution was the Catholic priest Pronaitis. He was not a reputable Russian Orthodox priest; indeed, one could not be found to do such "dirty work" at the bidding of the authorities. They were lucky to have found someone like Pronaitis at all. He was presumably well versed in both the Talmud and Kabbalah. In short, he presented himself as a great Hebraist and was introduced to the court as such. But when this "expert" began to speak, it was obvious to all that he was nothing short of an ignoramus, his only talent being the ability to talk a good game. However, since the authorities needed his long-winded verbiage to carry some weight, they feigned to respect him as a holy man of great stature.

    He began his lecture by stating matter-of-factly that the Jews offered human sacrifices and the Jewish religion commanded its adherents to murder gentiles. He even "interpreted" a sentence from the Talmud that supposedly said, "Murder the best of the gentiles." In the same vein, after finishing with the Talmud, he went on to the Kabbalah.

    However, in spite of all this, when the procurator asked him if he had any direct knowledge of Jews using Christian blood, he said he did not. His expert opinion had made an impression on no one. In fact, many in the audience occasionally laughed out loud when he clearly became confused and couldn't even intelligibly answer some of the questions asked by my lawyer.

    A minor sensation was produced when the testimony dealt with the number thirteen, a number which was supposed to have great significance when used in a Jewish context. The prosecution insisted that the thirteen wounds which Professor Sikorsky had discovered on Andriusha's body proved that they had been inflicted in accordance with "Jewish ritual." When it was discovered afterwards that there were actually fourteen wounds, the ritual murder charge lost even more credibility.

    Furthermore, all the perverse and ridiculous lies that Pronaitis had postulated were completely refuted by the brilliant, decisive testimony given by the well-known and universally respected Rabbi of Moscow, Rabbi Mazeh. He delivered a long, detailed speech quoting passages from the Torah, the Talmud and many other books to conclusively reveal both the absurdity and the stupidity inherent in the testimony of such "experts" as Pronaitis. Any intelligent person could see that the priest had no knowledge whatsoever of the Talmud and could hardly even read a passage in Hebrew.

    I'm sure you consider the Protocol of the Elders of Zion as fact too.

  • Evidently Hezakiah4 knows even less about Torah than he claims to know about the "numbers" of the "Hlocaust."

    What Christians call Old Testament, Judaism calls Torah She Bich Tav (Written Torah). Judaism refers to Talmud, Kabbala, and the rest of the rabbinical literature as Torah She BealPeh (Oral Torah). In Judaism Oral Torah supersedes Written Torah.

    "This is not an uncommon impression and one finds it sometimes among Jews as well as Christians - that Judaism is the religion of the Hebrew Bible. It is, of course, a fallacious impression. Judaism is not the religion of the Bible." [Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser, Judaism and the Christian Predicament, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1967, p.59, 159]

    "The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent,
    without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature, and round it are gathered a number of Midrashim, partly legal (Halachic) and partly works of edification (Haggadic). This literature, in its oldest elements, goes back to a time before the beginning of the Common Era, and comes down into the Middle Ages. Through it all run the lines of thought which were first drawn by the Pharisees, and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism." [Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 3 pg. 474]

    “Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval
    Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout thesechanges of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, thespirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered.” [Rabbi Dr. Finkelstein, The Pharisees: The Sociological Background of Their Faith, pg. xxi]

    "The Talmud is the written form of that which in the time of Jesus, was called the 'Tradition of the Elders,' and to which He makes frequent allusions." [Michael L. Rodkinson, The History of the Talmud: From The Time Of Its Formation About 200 B. C. Up To The Present Time, Kessinger Publishing, LLC (June 8, 2006), ISBN-13: 978-1428631366, p.70]

    “The complex of rabbinically ordained practices ... including
    most of the rules for the treatment of Scripture itself--do not derive from
    Scripture at all. Rabbinic Judaism's initial concern was with the elaboration and refinement of it's own system. Attaching the system to scripture was secondary. It therefore is misleading to depict rabbinic Judaism primarily as a consequence of an exegetical process or the organic unfolding of Scripture. Rather, rabbinic Judaism began as the work of a small, ambitious, and homogeneous group of pseudo-priests ...By the third century (A.D.) the rabbis expressed their self-conception in the ideology of "oral Torah" which held that a comprehensive body of teachings and practices (halachot) not included in Scripture had been given by God and through Moses only to the rabbinic establishment.” (Rabbinic Judaism: Structure and System, Jacob Nuesner, pp. 31-34)

    Don’t get suckered into one of the oldest rabbinical tricks, the
    claim that the Talmud is based on "Torah." A Christian assumes that "Torah" = Pentateuch, but there's the trick. In Judaism there are at least FIVE definitions of Torah. Here's the proof. 
    Please note FOUR definitions of Torah in the Jewish
    Encyclopedia's entry on Torah:

    “Originally, in order to maintain the distinction between the
    written Torah (see written law) and various traditional interpretations,
    customs and practices, the rabbis forbade the commitment to writing of the additional material. However, when it became too voluminous and chaotic conditions made oral transmission too uncertain, the ban was lifted and the material organized and transcribed in the form of the Mishnah, the Talmud, and other rabbinic works. The rabbis expressed their view that 'two Torahs' were given at Sinai, a Written Torah [Torah She Bich Tav, DEFINITION #1] and an Oral Torah [Torah SheBeal Peh, DEFINITION #2] (see oral law) and that at least some of the oral traditions relating to the meaning of basic biblical concepts were as authoritative as the written text (see halakah le-mosheh mi-sinai) In a sense the Oral Torah came to be regarded as more important than the Written Torah inasmuch as the explanations and understanding of the latter depended upon the former. A third meaning of the word ‘Torah’ therefore includes elements of the Oral Torah, which are considered authoritative or deoraita---'from the Torah.' Finally in its broadest sense, the word 'Torah' is sometimes used to refer to the entire corpus of Halacha and Aggadah, [DEFINITION #3] Written and Oral, from the Bible up to and including the latest Responsa and homiletical interpretations of the rabbis [DEFINITION #4]....” [The New Encyclopedia of Judaism, Geoffrey Wigoder editor in Chief, New York: New York University Press, 2002, ISBN 0814793996, page 778]

    Please note a FIFTH definition of Torah according to the Holy
    Father's favorite rabbi, “a great scholar” [Benedict XVI, Jesus of Nazareth,p.71]:

    “... The rabbi constituted the projection of the divine on earth. Honor was due him more than to the scroll of the Torah, for through his learning and logic he might alter the very content of Mosaic revelation. He was
    Torah [DEFINITION #5], not merely because he lived by it, but because at his best he constituted as compelling an embodiment of the heavenly model as did a Torah scroll itself.” [Rabbi Jacob Neusner, “The Phenomenon of the Rabbi in Late Antiquity: II The Ritual of 'Being a Rabbi' in Later Sasanian Babylonia,” Numen, Vol.17, Fasc. 1., Feb., 1970, pp.3-4]

    It gets worse because these “Torah” are on an ever-widening
    trajectory from God. Consider explicit corollaries of the great scholar's presumption that, because the rabbis are divine, they can “alter the very content of Mosaic revelation.”

    “...the Babylonian Talmud represents God in the flesh...” Rabbi Jacob Neusner, Rabbinic Judaism, Minneapolis MN: Augsburg Fortress, 1995. p. 62

    "The Holy One, Blessed be He, speaks Torah out of the mouths of all rabbis.” Haggadah 15b

    "The Bavli [Babylonian Talmud] has formed the definitive
    statement of Judaism from the time of its closure to the present day." Rabbi Jacob Neusner, quoted by Norman F. Cantor, The Sacred Chain: A History of the Jews, page 112)

    The Koliner rebbe [17th century rabbi of Prague] states: "Our Zaddikim's (famous Orthodox rabbis) words are more important than the Torah of Moses As our Sages teach: A Zaddik decrees, and God obeys." Jeremy Dauber,

    Antonio's Devils: Writers of the Jewish Enlightenment and the Birth of Modern Hebrew and Yiddish Literature,

    Stanford University, 2004, ISBN-13: 978-0804749015, p. 276, also documented in Judaism Discovered, p. 298

    The occultic portion of the Talmud, the Kabala, at Tikkunei
    Zohar 1:27b refers to the Mishnah of the Talmud as “the burial place of Moses.” The reference is an apt double entendre because the Talmud at Shabbat 15 teaches that it supersedes and nullifies the Old Testament, so “buries” the Pentateuch of Moses. 

    “Think not that I will accuse you to the Father: There is one that accuseth you, Moses, in whom you trust. For if you did believe in Moses, you would perhaps believe me also; for he wrote of me. But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe my words?” John 5:43-47

    Further, as the references show, NONE of this evidence comes from Fr. I. B. Pranaitis, but from the mouths and tomes of the rabbis themselves.

  • If you couldn't figure out for yourself why the Holocaust Fundamentalists insist on the uniqueness of their creed, they have told you.

    “If Auschwitz is true, it represents human suffering that is
    incomparably greater than that of Christ... Auschwitz is the denial of Christ.” Claude Lanzmann, Les Temps Modernes, Paris, December 1993, page 133

    They seek to replace Jesus Christ the King in His Judgment Seat!

    “When each of us stands before the Six Million, we will be asked what we did with our lives.” Simon Wiesenthal’s magazine Response,Vol. 20, No. 1

    “The Holocaust is a divine mystery whose secrets are reserved for a priesthood of survivors.” Elie Wiesel quoted in Peter Novick,The Holocaust in American Life, 1999,pp. 211-212.

    Certainly Jews were among the 55 million who died in World War
    II, but important claims by Holocaust Fundamentalists are crumbling under deserved examination, even though such examination is—unlike any other historical issue—criminalized in over a dozen "democracies." Have you forgotten that on August 7, 1933 a representative of the World Conference of Jews declared war on Germany and then broadcasted the declaration on WABC
    radio and published it in the New York Times?

    Judea Declares War on Germany









    For Germany then Jews were a declared internal enemy.  The pose as always sinless perpetual victims is a fraud. There is "cause" and there is "effect." Bad "cause" often begets bad "effect." Have you forgotten the victims of Jewish-led-and-funded Communist revolutions of the early twentieth century in Bavaria, Hungary, Russia, and elsewhere? There was a holocaust of over 60 million at the hands of Judeo-Bolshevism.Even today the rabbis speak approvingly of Hitler's work as
    divine retribution. Revealingly the rabbis have been saying approving things about Hitler and his "holocaust" for half a century, Chabad Lubavitch Grand Rabbi (and erstwhile "Messiah") Schneerson among them [Yehuda Bauer, "God as surgeon." Haaretz, June 1, 2007]. http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/865718.html

    Rabbi Elizer Schach, founder of the "Israeli" Shas Party: "Does anyone here think that before the holocaust, which exacted such a terrible price and left no family untouched all the Jews of Europe were righteous, God-fearing folk? There was a drift away from our faith and way of life. What happened was divine retribution for the accumulated weight of years of drifting away from Judaism." Mordecai Richter, National Post (Canada), August 26, 2000.

    "Israeli" Rabbi Ovadia Yosef stated that those who died in the Nazi persecutions were "reincarnated sinners" (yes, REINCARNATION. Judaism believes in reincarnation) who got what they deserved, that Hitler "was simply the messenger of God sent to give the Jewish people their just desserts." Jack Katzenell, "Rabbi Says Holocaust Victims Were Reincarnations of Sinners." The Independent

    (UK), August 6, 2000. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/rabbi-says-holocaust-victims-were-reincarnations-of-sinners-711547.html

    The Judaic Trotskyite Lennie Brenner documented ZIONIST
    COLLUSION WITH THE NAZIS in his book, "51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis," ISBN 9781569802359.




    You can put a crucifix in urine and call it Piss Christ art:

    You can paint a picture of the Blessed Virgin Mary with elephant

    You can burn New Testaments:

    You can brag about killing Jesus.
    “You and your f@#king Jesus can kiss my a$%....We killed Jesus and we’re proud of it...” http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e1842edc4f“We killed Jesus and we’ll kill you too!” http://www.palsolidarity.org/main/2006/11/18/hebron-day-06/

    You can deny the holocaust of 0ver 61 million Gentiles at the
    hands of Jewish Communism. See Part 1, especially “JEWISH TESTIMONY,” at http://www.catholicvoice.co.uk/pinay/ (Also
    available in the original book form as

    The Plot Against the Church

    Maurice Pinay from the bookstore at http://www.omnicbc.com )

    You can encourage the genocide of men, women, and children, even
    when they wave little white flags of surrender:






    You can even murder goyim to harvest their organs for transplant:








  • Like most hyper-Judaizers and despite his voluminous post on the supposed "libel," Hezakiah4, left out two important details:

    1) the name of the victim, Andrei Yutchinsky, and

    2) the court determined that the 13-year-old boy was indeed murdered ritually.

    All the bribery and pressure brought to bear on that trial was able, as it has in other "libels," been able to obtain the release of the perpetrator, but could not conceal that facts of the ritual killings, usually of children.

    Judaizers like to focus on torture that has been used to obtain some confessions, but they are at pains to explain how torture infused the perpetrators with unique knowledge such as the locations of the bodies and the gory locations of the ritual killings (e.g., in the cases of Fr. Thomas of Damascus and  St. Simon of Trent).

    The son of the Chief Rabbi of Rome, Israeli Prof. Ariel Toaff, documented the Ashkenazi cult of ritual child murder in Italy, Spain, Germany, and elsewhere in Europe:

    Toaff, Ariel. Pasque di Sangue: Ebrei d’Europa e omicidi rituali
    [Bloody Passover: European Jews and Ritual Homicide] (Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino, 2007). http://www.vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres7/pasque.pdf

    An English translation is available at


    Under great ADL duress Toaff penned a censored second edition with the profits promised to the ADL.

    (Wagner, Matthew & AP, “‘Blood Libel’
    Author halts press,” The Jerusalem Post, February 14, 2007,http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1170359860024&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull)  

    Others have documented such ritual kilings.

    “It has been clearly proven that the Jew Juce Franco did seduce
    some Christians [Marrano false converts] to the rites and ceremonies of the Law of Moses by teaching them Jewish prayers, praying in Hebrew to the Creator to whom he commended them, and telling them that the Law of Moses was the true law, whereas the Law of Christ was false.  He also taught them the times of the Jewish Passover and other Fasts, and explained to them why the Jews did not eat certain meats. He further did communicate to and participate with these same Christians in other mysteries of his Jewish law, serving them Jewish foods and wine, eating and drinking with them the better to confirm them in the Law of Moses. …This Juce Franco personally took part, together with other Jews and with Christians [the Marranos], in the crucifixion –at night
    and in a secret cave– of an innocent Christian boy. They stretched out his arms and legs on two boards arranged in the form of a Cross. Then they flogged him, spat on him, beat him, tore out the pieces of his flesh, and put a crown of thorns on his head. This Juce Franco, with his own hands seized the bleeding boy by the arm, cut open his side with a knife, and took out his heart. Then he beat him and tore his flesh in memory and vituperation of the Sacred Passion of Jesus Christ our Redeemer, uttering curses and insults on the Person of Christ as though He were actually on the Cross. And while they were flogging the said
    youth, they said to him: “This traitor and deceiver, when he preached, spoke lies against the Law of God and the Law of Moses.”

    “Now you will pay for the things you said and did in that ancient time. You thought you would abase us and exalt yourself, for which you
    shall suffer even more evil than this. You thought you would destroy us, but we will destroy you. Crucify him. crucify him —this dog, this swindler, this deceiver, and bewitcher! He called himself King of the Jews. But he was a mere man, like any other, a bastard born in adultery, the son of a corrupt and adulterous woman

    [this corroborates the veracity of blasphemous quotes from the Torah]

    . He tried to destroy the Jews and their Law, but it is he who will be destroyed by us, for coming to turn the Jews into Christians with his deceptions and witchcraft.” These words and vituperations this Juce Franco and the other Jews first taught to these Christians [the Marranos], who then imitated these Jews in the same manner, repeating the same vituperations and others of the same kind. And after the child had been tortured and crucified by this Juce Franco and the others, they killed him, took him down from the Cross, and took him away and secretly buried him that same night where no one could find him. Some days later this Jew, Juce Franco, and all his other accomplices in this
    crime, met together secretly in the same cave, where they performed certain conjuring and experiments in witchcraft with the heart of the dead boy and a consecrated Communion wafer. They performed these conjurings with the perverted and diabolical intention of making the Inquisitors against heretical depravity together with all other Christians go mad and die of madness, and of subverting, and destroying and killing the Holy Faith of Jesus.”

    Longhurst, John Edward. “The Ritual Murder of La Guardia,” The
    Age of Torquemada. The Library of Iberian Resources Online, XI: 149-152.


    See also:

    Walsh, William Thomas. The Last Crusader: Isabella of Spain
    (Rockford IL: Tan Books, 1987) Chapter 25, “The Crucifixion of the Holy Child of La Guardia Hastens Isabel's Decision to Expel All the Jews from Spain - a Cause Célèbre,” 342-372

  • So... what Torah inspires such a genocidal religion?

    "You are adam  ["man"], but goyim  [gentiles] are not called adam  ["man"]." Kerithoth 6b

    “The seed of the goyim  is like an animal.” Sanhedrin 74b

    “All Gentile children are animals.” Yebamoth 98a

    "The best of the gentiles should all be killed." Sopherim 15, rule 10

    "...'living soul' designates Israel because they are children of the Almighty, and their souls, which are holy, come from Him. From whence come the souls of other peoples? R[abbi] Eleazar said: 'They obtain souls from those sides of the left which convey impurity, and therefore they are all impure and defile those who have contact with them.'...'living soul' refers to Israel, who have holy living souls from above, and 'cattle and creeping things and beasts of the earth,' to the other peoples who are not 'living soul," but who are as we have said." Bereshith 47a

    “Gentile souls are of a completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever… their material
    abundance derives from supernal refuse. Indeed, they themselves derive from refuse, which is why they are more numerous than the Jews…” Abraham Foxbrunner.  Habad: The Hasidism of Schneur Zalman of Lyady [the founder of the Chabad cult of Orthodox Hassidic Judaism] . Northvale NJ: Jason Aronson Inc., 1983. Pp. 108-109.

    "One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail."
    Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994 [N.Y. Times, Feb. 28, 1994, p. 1] at the eulogy for Dr. Baruch Goldstein, Kach Party terrorist who used a machine gun to murder at least 39 Palestinians worshipping at Cave of the Patriarchs mosque in Hebron.  Rabbis praised his mass
    murder and then Prime Minister Yitshak Rabin gave permission for a memorial to honor Goldstein. Here's a picture of the shrine to the mass murderer:


    Rabbi Eliyahu exhorts the killing of women and children:


    "The Jew by his source and in his very essence is entirely good. The goy, by his source and his very essence, is completely evil. This is not simply a matter of religious distinction, but rather of two completely different species." Rabbi Saadya Grama, Romemut Yisrael Ufarashat Hagalut ("Jewish Superiority and the Question of Exile") 2003.

    “Souls of non-Jews come entirely from the female part of the
    Satanic sphere. For this reason souls of non-Jews are called evil.” [Yesaiah Tishbi, Torat ha-Rave-ha-Kelippahnbe-Kabbalat ha-Ari (The Theory of Evil and the Satanic Sphere in Kabbalah) 1942, reprinted 1982] The Messianic age of restoration and redemption (tikkun olam) forecast by the religion of Judaism and spoon-fed to their partisans among the goyim, posits a world restored to universal harmony and justice. That’s the cover story, anyway. But the truth it is somewhat more macabre, as Tishby relates: “… the presence of Israel among
    the nations mends the world, but not the nations of the world…. It does not bring the nations closer to holiness, but rather it extracts the holiness from them and thereby destroys their ability to exist… [T]he purpose of the full redemption is to destroy the vitality of all the peoples.”], Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition, and Deceit, ISBN 13: 9780970378453, pp.774-775

    Because Gentiles are not human, Gentiles are owed no debt of
    morality or decency - not honesty [Baba Kamma 113a], not property [Baba Mezia 24a], not even life! — “The best of the Gentiles should all be killed” Soferim 15, 10

    "Some of the Turks and the nomads in the North, and the
    Blacks and the nomads in the South, and those who resemble them in our climates. And their nature is like the nature of mute animals, and according to my opinion they are not on the level of human beings, and their level among existing things is below that of a man and above that of a monkey, because they have the image and the resemblance of a man more than a monkey does." Maimonides explaining who is not fit “to participate in the world to come,” Guide for the Perplexed, Book III, chapter 51 cited in Israel Shahak, Hebrew University Professor, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years.
    London: Pluto Press, 1997. p. 25.


    "... the explanation of the matter, [is to be found] in light of what Rabbi Chayim Vital wrote in Shaar HaKedushah (and in Etz Chayim, Portal 5, ch. 2) — that every Jew, whether righteous or wicked, possesses two souls, as it is written, “And neshamot (souls) which I have made. ... The second, uniquely Jewish, soul is truly “a part of G-d above, The souls of the nations of the world (the Gentiles), however, emanate from the other, unclean kelipot which contain no good whatever, as is written in Etz Chayim, Portal 40, ch. 3, that all the good that (Gentiles) do, is done out of selfish motives. So the Gemara comments on the verse, “The kindness of (Gentiles) is sin” — that
    all the charity and kindness done by (Gentiles) of the world is only for their self-glorification..." (Chapters 1 and 2) The lower category consists of three completely unclean and evil kelipot, containing no good whatever... From them flow and are derived the souls of all the nations of the world (Gentiles), and the sustaining force of their bodies. Also derived from these kelipot are the souls of all living creatures that are unclean and forbidden to be eaten, and the sustaining force of their bodies." Tanya, Chapter 6


    "Rabbi Kook the Elder, the revered father of the messianic
    tendency in Jewish fundamentalism, said, 'The difference between a Jewish soul and the souls of non-Jews—all of them in all different levels—is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.' Rabbi Kook's entire teaching... is followed devoutly by, among others, those who have led the settler movement in the occupied West Bank... According to the ideologies which underlie Gush Emunum, the militant West Bank settlers group, and Hasidism, non-Jews have 'satanic souls'... Members of Gush Emunum argue
    that 'what appears to be confiscation of Arab-owned land for subsequent
    settlement by Jews is in reality not an act of stealing but one of
    sanctification.' From their perspective the land is redeemed by being
    transferred from the satanic to the divine sphere... Common to both the Talmud and the Halacha, Orthodox religious law, is a differentiation between Jews and non-Jews. The highly revered Rabbi Menachem Mandel Schneerson, who headed the Chabad movement and wielded great influence in Israel as well

    [and proclaimed himself messiah]

    , explained that 'The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish
    person stems from the common expression: 'Let us differentiate.' Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather we have a case of 'let us differentiate' between totally different species. This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of all nations of the world.'" Allan C. Brownfield, "It Is Time to Confront the Exclusionary Ethnocentrism," Issues of the American Council for Judaism, Winter 2000, cited in Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, pp.365-366.

    Chabad leader Rebbe Schneerson taught that Christianity is a
    form a mental illness.

See his video here:


    "And for Christians let there be no hope..." Birkat HaMinim, "Benediction" #12 of the Shmone Esreh

    "It is our duty to praise the Master of All, to ascribe greatness to the molder of primeval creation, for He has not made us like the nations of the lands, for He has not assigned our portion like theirs nor our lot like theirs, for they bow to vanity and emptiness and pray to a god who
    cannot save--man, ash, blood, bile, stinking flesh, maggot, defiled men and women, adulterers and adulteresses, dying in their iniquity and rotting in their wickedness, worn out dust, rot of maggot [and worm]--and pray to a god who cannot save." Aleinu from Judaic prayer book, Two Nations in Your Womb, Israel Jacob Yuval, University of California Press, 2006, p.119

    “I want to attack their souls.” Rabbi Abraham Heschel,
    interviewed by Geula Cohen for Ma'ariv, January 4, 1965 as translated by


    "Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone
    of hate - healthy, virile hate - for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German." (Elie Wiesel: Legends of Our Time,"Appointment with Hate, NY, Avon, 1968, pp. 177-178).

    "I too, like Hitler, believe in the power of the blood
    idea" -Chaim Nachman Bailik, Israel’s national poet, in “The Present Hour”

  • @DiegoMilagro - One of the greatest outcry of Christians is the ever so
    popular,"That's rabbinic!",yet the concepts of the Greek text are rabbinic in
    nature. Taken from the teachings of the sages and the Oral Torah (Talmud),the
    actual meanings were lost after the Jewish influence disappeared from the
    church.What started out as simply another sect of Judaism turned away from its
    basic ideals into a totally non-Judaic creation of adding Roman and Greco
    influences.Here are quotations from the Greek text and their Jewish counterparts
    in sources commonly unknown to the average adherent to the Christian

    Let's take the L-rd's Prayer in Matt 6,which is phrase by phrase a
    compilation of Hebrew thought in the Tanakh (Hebrew text),prayers,and Mishnah
    (Oral Torah)
    NO VAIN REPETITIONS. Ecc5;2,"....for G-d is in heaven and thou
    art on earth;therefore let your words be few."
    HEAVEN. Isaiah63:16,"Doubtless Thou art our Father,...Thou,O L-rd,art our
    HALLOWED BE THY NAME. Kaddish prayer,"Exalted and hallowed be
    G-d's great name in this world...."
    EARTH AS IN HEAVEN.Kaddish prayer,"May His will be fulfilled and His sovereignty
    revealed speedily in our days.Also see Dan2:44,"the G-d of heaven (shall) set up
    a kingdom,which shall never be destroyed....."
    Proverbs30:8,"...feed me with food convenient for me(Original Hebrew "with my
    allotted bread')
    22:25,"If thou lend money to any of my people that is poor by thee,thou shall
    not be to him as a usurer(Hebrew original is creditor)..."Also see Jer
    31;34,"...for I will forgive their iniquity..."
    TEMPTATION,BUT DELIVER US FROM EVIL.Oral Law Berakot 60b,"..bring me not into
    sin,or iniquity,or into temptation...and deliver me from evil."
    the greatness,and the power and the glory,and the victory,and the
    majesty;..thine is the kingdom Ps:145:11: They shall speak of the glory of thy
    kingdom, and talk of thy power;
    The Beatitude format is found in the Secrets
    of Enoch,a Pharisaic apocryphal work of the first century BCE.We see the
    following ideas of blessedness.Blessed is he who---blesses all the L-rd's
    work---keeps the Fathers foundations---raises the fallen--implants peace and
    love---speaks humbly---enters only good houses---brings gifts with faith before
    the L-rd's face for forgiveness of sin and it is said the just who escape the
    great judgement are blessed.
    Now let's look at the sermon on the mount and
    its parallels to the Beatitudes:
    BLESSED ARE THE POOR.Psalm34:18,"The L-rd
    saveth such as be of a contrite spirit."
    61;2,"...to comfort all that mourn."
    BLESSED ARE THE MEEK.Psalm37:11,"but the
    meek shall inherit the earth."
    RIGHTIOUSNESS.Deut16;20,"That which is altogether just shall you follow that you
    shall live
    BLESSED ARE THE MERCIFUL.Shabbat15lb,"He who has mercy on his
    fellow creatures obtains mercy for himself."
    HEART.Psalm24:3-4,"Who shall ascend into the hill of the L-rd?..He that has
    clean hands and a pure heart."
    good;seek peace,and pursue it."
    RIGHTIOUSNESS' SAKE Isaiah 51:7-8,"Harken unto Me,ye that know righteousness,the
    people in whose heart is MY law;fear ye not the reproach of men,neither be
    afraid of their revilings...My salvation shall be from generation to
    These two are the main sermons that the Nazarene gave and reflect
    the Judaic concepts and teachings he learned not made up.Other
    Mt:7:3: And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's
    eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
    Baba Bathra
    15b,"If he(the reprover) say to him,Take the mote from thine eyes,the other
    replies Take the beam from thine eyes

    Mt:5:28: But I say unto you, That
    whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her
    already in his heart.
    Masekheth Kallah,"He who deliberately looks at a
    (married)woman is as though he had a connection with her."

    Mt:6:20: But
    lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth
    corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal:
    Baba Bathra11a,"My
    fathers have laid up a treasure for this world;I have laid up a treasure for the
    world to come."

    Mt5:21: Ye have heard that it was said by them of old
    time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the
    22: But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother
    without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment:and whosoever shall say to
    his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say,
    Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.
    Derehk Emunah U-Maaseh Rav: The
    angry man fills his mouth with live coals and with needles,sharp and hard.For
    each angry word he utters,he deserves to be banished from holiness in shame and
    disgrace,and to suffer grievously until his soul is purified from its
    blemishes.Every man must be the master of his mouth.

    Mt:5:16: Let your
    light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your
    Father which is in heaven.
    Dubnow,H.ofCh:The good man should himself be the
    Torah,and people should be able to learn good conduct from observing

    Mt:5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever
    shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
    Siach Sarfei
    Kodesh:The verse in Psalms81:8:I answered thee in the secret place of thunder;I
    proved thee at the waters of Meribah teaches us that the L-rd will answer the
    prayer of the man who keeps his anger secret,though highly provoked by the other
    man's quarrelsomeness. (Note:Meribeh=Quarrelsomeness)

    Jn:14:11: Believe
    me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me:
    Or ha'Emeth:Who is the true
    believer in G-d?The man who believes that the Shekinah is within him always and
    guards him;That he is in the creator and the Creator is him.

    Mt:6:14: For
    if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive
    Tractate Megillah"Those who forgive people who sin against them --

    their sins will be forgiven."

    The majority of the Nazarenes
    quotes,when not directly from the Tanahk,were quotes directly from the teachings
    of the rabbis and scholars of Judaism.Just by reading his purported statements
    and knowing the source;one can see that he taught and lived what Christians
    call,with contempt,rabbinic Judaism.It makes you wonder who lives more by what
    he taught ;the Jew who lives Torah observant and doesn't accept his messianic
    claims or the Christian who denigrates Judaism and its adherence to the

Post a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *