Month: December 2009

  • Question 197 – Death penalty

    I know the Church doesn't sanction the death penalty except in cases where the subject can't be contained resonably and situations like that are rare, but I don't believe the situations are rare. I believe that every murderer, rapists, serial killers, and other such criminals all have the capability to escape from prison, and if they did they would continue to murder... ect. So wouldn't it make sence to get rid of criminals like this that are a significant danger to society because if they escape they would only cause more damage. Instead of leaving open the chance of many more lives being destroyed, no matter how small the chance, why doesn't the Church sanction killing them so there is a 0% chance of more damage being done? Is there anything wrong with that view?

     

    R. Sungenis: Convicts are imprisoned on the basis that they will not escape, not on the possibility than could escape. As such, escape cannot be a criterion for whether someone gets the death penalty. Percentage wise, escapes from prison are very rare.

  • Question 196 – What about bombing abortion clinics?

    Question 196 – What about bombing abortion clinics?

     

    I was curious about whether or not bombing an abortion facility would be morally justified because the lives of those babies saved would be more than the lives lost, and the lives lost are nothing more than sick twisted murderers that are a danger to society and talk people into killing their babies. Abortion providers should by law get the death penalty for murder anyway.

     

    R. Sungenis: Bombing an abortion facility is not lawful under God or man. We must work through the law God has established (Romans 13:1-7). If we sanctioned bombing of abortion facilities, then we could sanction the bombing of porn shops, gambling casinos, gay bath houses, and even apartment buildings where we know sexual escapades are occurring. In fact, we could bomb any facility that we think is housing some kind of heinous sin.

  • Question 195 - What is the difference between perfect and imperfect contrition?

    Dear Robert, I know that if someone doesn't get to confession perfect contrition gets forgiveness for all types of sins mortal or venial. But what about imperfect contrition? Does it have the same effect and if not what effect does it have?

    William

     

    Dear William: “Perfect” and “Imperfect” are technical terms used by the Church.

     

    The difference between perfect and imperfect contrition is: the former is contrition motivated out of love for God and so the man wishes to reform his ways because he loves the offended, whereas the latter is contrition which is motivated by fear of punishment, of God, of Hell. Both suffice for a valid confession, as the older version of the Act of Contrition states: "...I detest all my sins, because I dread the loss of heaven and the pains of Hell (imperfect), but most of all they offend thee, My God (perfect), who art all good and deserving of all my love..." Furthermore, the CCC defines them in this way:

     

    1452 When it arises from a love by which God is loved above all else, contrition is called "perfect" (contrition of charity). Such contrition remits venial sins; it also obtains forgiveness of mortal sins if it includes the firm resolution to have recourse to sacramental confession as soon as possible.

     

    1453 The contrition called "imperfect" (or "attrition") is also a gift of God, a prompting of the Holy Spirit. It is born of the consideration of sin's ugliness or the fear of eternal damnation and the other penalties threatening the sinner (contrition of fear). Such a stirring of conscience can initiate an interior process which, under the prompting of grace, will be brought to completion by sacramental absolution. By itself however, imperfect contrition cannot obtain the forgiveness of grave sins, but it disposes one to obtain forgiveness in the sacrament of Penance.

     

    1492 Repentance (also called contrition) must be inspired by motives that arise from faith. If repentance arises from love of charity for God, it is called "perfect" contrition; if it is founded on other motives, it is called "imperfect."

     

    Perfect contrition remits mortal and venial sins, if he has a firm resolution to go to confession ASAP. So a person in this state, may receive Holy Communion. However, the man in a state of imperfect contrition may not receive Holy Communion, since it only disposes the man to seek the Sacrament of Reconciliation.

     

    Robert

     

    PS: My thanks to Laurence Gonzaga of the BTF staff for doing the research on this question.